To: | topband@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: CONTEST OBSERVATION |
From: | Bill Tippett <btippett@alum.mit.edu> |
Date: | Tue, 01 Feb 2005 11:33:19 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
W4EF: >On the RX side, I can now say unequivocally that the FT-847 is not a contest grade receiver (not even close). The one I used suffered from horrendous filter blowby and all kinds of phantom signals. It's works fine for casual operating, but it doesn't really hold up when the band gets full of very strong signals. Mike, this should be no surprise after looking at page 28 of ARRL's Expanded Test Report: http://www2.arrl.org/members-only/prodrev/pdf/lab/ft-847.pdf The innermost data points of both graphs are for 1 kHz spacing: IMD = 66 dB BDR = 84 dB For comparison, Orion has IMD = 84 dB and BDR = 118 dB at 1 kHz, both of which can be improved another ~10 dB at 1 kHz spacings by adding the $80 Inrad 762 filter. Moral: "Numbers don't lie...some advertisers do." 73, Bill W4ZV _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: RE: Butternut HF2V Configuration, Javier Lopez |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: Echoes and CT3 in Boring, Oregon, Tree |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: CONTEST OBSERVATION, Michael Tope |
Next by Thread: | RE: Topband: CONTEST OBSERVATION, Richard Detweiler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |