| To: | topband@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, |
| From: | Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 26 Sep 2013 12:29:08 -0400 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
As I recall, BC stations tried 5/8 wavelength antennas to maximize their groundwave coverage. Unfortunately, the high angle lobe produced a skywave that caused severe interference fading at night out in their desired coverage area. 73, Roger -- Remember the Liberty (AGTR-5) http://www.usslibertyveterans.org/ http://www.gtr5.com/ _________________ Topband Reflector |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo bettathan shorterversions??, Tom W8JI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??, Charlie Cunningham |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??,, Richard Fry |
| Next by Thread: | Topband: 5/8 wavelength vertical is mo betta than shorterversions??,, Richard Fry |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |