Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: [Fwd: Re: qsling]

To: topBand List <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: [Fwd: Re: qsling]
From: Art <k6xt@arrl.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:47:59 -0600
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
And even with the pain some go through to beat LoTW into submission, its 
a lot less work than paper QSLing. Only has to be correctly set up once.

73 Art

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Re: Topband: qsling
Date:   Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:00:09 -0400
From:   Tom Haavisto <kamham69@gmail.com>
To:     dt <wd5r@hughes.net>
CC:     topband@contesting.com
References:     <4AEC3E1C.2080605@hughes.net>



Is LOTW a bit of a pain?  Sure.  The process could be easier, but it is what
it is.  I find I also send a lot fewer QSL cards these days, as LOTW takes
care of a lot of the QSLs I require.  I do QSL 100% to all received cards,
as I assume (hope) do most folks.

[Snip]
Tom - VE3CX

[snip]

_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Topband: [Fwd: Re: qsling], Art <=