| To: | Kevin Schavee <n0cwrham@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: comparison |
| From: | Herb Schoenbohm <herbs@surfvi.com> |
| Reply-to: | herbs@surfvi.com |
| Date: | Wed, 24 Dec 2008 18:43:22 -0400 |
| List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
Kevin Schavee wrote: > Has any one modeled the difference between Inverted L and full size > 1/4 wave 160m antennas? > > I'm no pileup buster with 60'/65' Inverted L this I know! > > > Change it from a inverted L to a T and you shouldl notice a big difference working DX if you have a good radial system under the vertical drop. 73 Herb Schoenbohm, KV4FZ _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: comparison, Jim Brown |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: comparison, k4pi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Topband: comparison, Jim Brown |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: comparison, GEORGE WALLNER |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |