Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Fwd: ARRL Board meets next week - I'm looking for input

To: "<topband@contesting.com>" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Fwd: ARRL Board meets next week - I'm looking for input
From: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2015 13:40:49 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Jim,

Thanks, I have done the same.

You can give your opinion on this subject by contacting your ARRL division 
director.
Click on this webpage,  select your director, and send an email !

http://www.arrl.org/divisions <http://www.arrl.org/divisions>

73,
Bob
K6UJ





 
> On Jul 11, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
> 
> On Fri,7/10/2015 7:09 AM, Tony K1AMF wrote:
>> Please e-mail N2YBB or other ARRL board members directly with any questions 
>> or comments.
> 
> Here's what I wrote to my Director, and to a few others who I know. My 
> Subject line was "DXCC Rules and Remote Operation."
> 
> =   =   =   =   =
> 
> In advance of a meeting where I expect this issue to be discussed, I want to 
> let you know how I feel about DXCC Rules and Remote Operation.
> 
> I am strongly opposed to the use of a remote station to give the operator a 
> geographical advantage over his licensed location for geographically based 
> awards like DXCC, WAS, VUCC. I also object to the use of rented stations for 
> this purpose, no matter where they are located. I have no objection to an 
> operator using a remote station that he has built with or without the 
> assistance of others within a few hundred miles of his home QTH.
> 
> I am also strongly opposed to the current DXCC Rules that allow credit for 
> QSOs made from a location anywhere in the continental United States. I favor 
> instead a rule similar to that for VUCC, which allows credit for QSOs made no 
> more than 200 km apart. For DXCC, 700 miles might be a more appropriate 
> distance. The existing rule greatly cheapens the award.
> 
> Having operated first from WV, then from Chicago, and now from Northern 
> California, I can testify that working DX on any band is very different 
> between W8/W9 and W6. I did not start over moving from WV to Chicago, but I 
> did when moving to CA 9 years ago. I would have felt that I was cheating if I 
> had not.
> 
> I have 135 countries confirmed on 160M and 201 on 80M since moving to W6 nine 
> years ago. Under the current rules, I could almost certainly add 50 countries 
> to each of those bands by renting a station in W1 for any contest weekend. 
> That stinks.
> 
> 73, Jim Brown K9YC
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>