Wayne....
Would you also support elimination of subbands on 80 and 40m and higher
bands? 160m activity has reached the point where it is akin to those bands,
and activity continues to increase.
I've had too many good DX stations clobbered by SSB QSOs intruding into the
low end. An SSB subband make sense to me, both for contests and general DXing.
73/Jon AA1K
At 07:31 AM 5/22/97 -0400, you wrote:
> Just a freindly reminder.To the vast silent majority. Write,E-mail and
>badger your
> SM, Dir and CAC rep. NOT to support the notion of sub bands on 160.
> Don't let the squeaky wheel be the only noise that they hear .
>
> 73' Wayne W3EA
>(ex KY3N)
>
>--
>FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
>Submissions: topband@contesting.com
>Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
>Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/topband.html
Submissions: topband@contesting.com
Administrative requests: topband-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-topband@contesting.com
|