Larry, I don't want to argue with you. It's all legal period. No I'm not a
subscriber. I have my own station that suits me well. I only need P5 for #1
honor roll and not much else would drive me to need the service. The owners
are personal friends of mine, I knew them long before RHR came about. I saw
the concept born and nurtured. I saw the hard work these guys do putting up
towers and antennas. These guys work really hard digging footings for towers
and hand mixing cement where trucks can't get to. Climbing towers over 150
feet is not for the faint of heart. These guys work hard and I admire their
fortitude. So based on that alone I have to give them credit. They provide a
service that isn't for everybody but yet there is obviously a calling for it
and for those who really benefit from it I won't try to spoil it for them or
condem them. For me, dxcc or any award for that matter is a personal quest and
how others achieve it doesn't concern me. I just have to wo
rk harder at it. That doesn't mean that I would Pat them on the back if they
did #1 honor roll using it 100%. I'm able to split the pig in half. I don't
whine about it. Can you see my point?
Lou W1QJ in Connecticut.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Burke <wi5a@sbcglobal.net>
To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 10:05 AM
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
So you're telling me that RHR and those RHR attorneys on retainer used a QST
product review as their determination that their operation is legal?
Just curious... are you an RHR subscriber, Lou?
- Larry K5RK
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [<a
href="mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com?";>mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com</a>]
On Behalf Of Louis
Parascondola via Topband
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:56 AM
To: <a href="mailto:wi5a@sbcglobal.net";>wi5a@sbcglobal.net</a>; <a
href="mailto:topband@contesting.com";>topband@contesting.com</a>
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
I'm sure qst did their homework on the issue first.
Sent from AOL Mobile Mail
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Burke <<a href="mailto:wi5a@sbcglobal.net";>wi5a@sbcglobal.net</a>>
To: 'Louis Parascondola' <<a
href="mailto:gudguyham@aol.com";>gudguyham@aol.com</a>>; topband
<<a href="mailto:topband@contesting.com";>topband@contesting.com</a>>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 09:26 AM
Subject: RE: Topband: strange propagation
Correction.... should have read "non-lawyer".
- Larry K5RK
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [<a
href="<a
href="mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com?";>mailto:topband-bounces@contest";>mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com?";>mailto:topband-bounces@contest</a>
ing.com</a>] On Behalf Of Larry Burke
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:23 AM
To: 'Louis Parascondola'; <a
href="<a
href="mailto:topband@contesting.com";>topband@contesting.com</a?">mailto:topband@contesting.com";>topband@contesting.com</a</a>>
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
The RHR lawyers consider a product review in QST by a non-ham as their legal
review? How interesting.
You said you can get the "ruling" that the RHR guys go by. The QST product
review is it?!?
- Larry K5RK
From: Louis Parascondola [<a
href="<a
href="mailto:gudguyham@aol.com?";>mailto:gudguyham@aol.com</a">mailto:gudguyham@aol.com?";>mailto:gudguyham@aol.com</a</a>>]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 8:10 AM
To: <a href="<a
href="mailto:wi5a@sbcglobal.net";>wi5a@sbcglobal.net</a?">mailto:wi5a@sbcglobal.net";>wi5a@sbcglobal.net</a</a>>;
<a
href="<a
href="mailto:topband@contesting.com";>topband@contesting.com</a?">mailto:topband@contesting.com";>topband@contesting.com</a</a>>
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
Larry, I posted it all an hour ago.
-----Original Message-----
From: Larry Burke <<a
href="<a
href="mailto:wi5a@sbcglobal.net";>wi5a@sbcglobal.net</a?">mailto:wi5a@sbcglobal.net";>wi5a@sbcglobal.net</a</a>>>
To: topband <<a
href="<a
href="mailto:topband@contesting.com";>topband@contesting.com</a?">mailto:topband@contesting.com";>topband@contesting.com</a</a>>>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 9:03 am
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
> RHR has lawyers on retainer and I'm sure this has been legally looked at.
I can get the ruling they go by.
We'll be waiting with bated breath, Lou Parascondola.
- Larry K5RK
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - <a href="<a
href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband";
target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a>"
target="_blank"><a href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a"
target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a</a>>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - <a href="<a
href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband";
target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a>"
target="_blank"><a href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a"
target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a</a>>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - <a href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband";
target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - <a href="http://www.contesting.com/_topband";
target="_blank">http://www.contesting.com/_topband</a>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|