| To: | <topband@contesting.com> | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receiveissues | 
| From: | k8do@msn.com (k8do) | 
| Date: | Sat, 15 Sep 2001 15:00:41 +0100 | 
| Frank, For any hope at all of working DX you need a vertical transmit.... A top loaded <whatever you can stand up> will work better than any dipole, by magnitudes... I predict that if you try to do topband dxing with that dipole you will taking up photography or model airplanes before spring comes... I sepnt 20 years on a tiny city lot... I have tried everything known to man, invented a few unknown antennas even, and the cheapy vertical with the 60 very short radials (all I could manage) was the only thing that worked... Denny | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receive issues, Frank Norton KB8XU | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Topband: More Skew, Robert Brown | 
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receive issues, Frank Norton KB8XU | 
| Next by Thread: | Topband: shortened & low dipole for 160M--transmit/receiveissues, Ivo PEZER, 5B4ADA | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |