>Interesting site, but I see the neutrons were abt +1.5 on both 20th and
>21st. Prop was great on the 20th, but non-existent on the 21st. Must
>be another factor somewhere!
>73, Greg, ZL3IX
> I believe the cosmic ray count decrease parameter should be used as a
> long term indicator of DXing - not as a sure-fire daily indicator. And I
> agree with your last sentence - there is at least one other variable
> (more than likely more than just one!) running around out there that we
> don't have a handle on yet.
> Carl K9LA
>
Carl and Greg,
I fully agree with your comments and just updated these pages on my website,
after the last two openings with ZL3IX:
http://www.iv3prk.it/new-zealand.htm
http://www.iv3prk.it/oceania.htm
http://www.iv3prk.it/last-3-months.htm
It would be interesting to keep propagation tests with you Greg also during
the years of solar maximum!
Merry Christmas and an Happy New Year to all
Luis IV3PRK
_______________________________________________
160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M
|