Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Impedance of inv l?

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Impedance of inv l?
From: "Edward Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2018 10:08:18 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
I am not sure where you are getting your information that cutting the losses
in your 160 vertical from 60 - 37 Ohms will have no difference in
performance - technically or noticeably but its not correct.

 

Reducing ground losses is THE ISSUE on 160M.  Calling a 1.2:1 SWR great and
not realizing what is being traded to get there, it really lacking of the
right solution.

 

A 160M antenna should have the lowest possible losses for the site and then
the resulting SWR matched or tolerated.  Not the other way around.

 

73

 

Ed  N1UR

 

 

"Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2018 11:41:12 -0500

From: <JAYB1943@OPTONLINE.NET>

To: <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>, <ww3s@zoominternet.net>,         "Topband"

                <topband@contesting.com>

Subject: Re: Topband: Impedance of inv l?

Message-ID: <F43BD6F1A0AD4625907582ABB92BBD54@jayPC>

Content-Type: text/plain;            charset="UTF-8"

 

Theoretical impedance for a perfect 1/4 wave ground plane is 37 ohms. 60 

ohms is great; 1.2:1 VSWR ? leave it alone, you will never notice any 

difference if you try to improve it. It will change with rain, snow, etc 

anyhow..73 Jay ny2ny"

 

_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>