> what is the minimum distance (in wavelengths) for reliable (far field)
> results???
>
> Uli, DJ2YA
>
Uli and all,
The distance must be sufficient so your measuring instrument does not "see"
the elements of the array separately. It also must see a single element as
one source, since near-field radiation varies from bottom to top.
One common rule of thumb is 10 times the maximum array spacing (or antenna
height). This implies a "viewing angle" of 5.7 degrees, which should be OK
for amateur use, but precision measurements probably need 20x
spacing/height.
Another recommendation comes from AM broadcasting, where FCC rules require
all measurements within 2 miles to be corrected for near-field effects.
Assuming this applies to the worst case, which is the low end of the AM
band, the corresponding distance at 160M is around 0.6 mile (~1 km).
In the VHF/UHF/microwave world, 10 wavelengths is a common distance for "far
field" measurements. This is more than either of the above rules, but
antennas at these frequencies are also typically much larger (in
wavelengths) than at lower frequencies.
In some cases, useful (but not precise) gain and F/B measurements can be
made quite close to the antenna, especially if you have elements in line
like Tree's array. I'd use such measurements for tune-up only, then confirm
them with more distant data.
73, Gary
K9AY
_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband
|