TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] What's wrong with the Ten Tec Scout? Not much.

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>, tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] What's wrong with the Ten Tec Scout? Not much.
From: w8au@sssnet.com
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 02:49:06 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
At 04:11 PM 7/8/2012, Kevin Anderson wrote:  (abridged)
I own two Scouts - an original (Model 555) and the 5 watt Argo (Model 556) version. Both operate just fine for me, with no drift that others have complained about. I have used the internal keyer on the original Scout while operating stationary mobile (rover) each year in the Illinois QSO Party, but I haven't noticed drift. They are solid radios, which is what I like, and they are very simple to use. There are PTOs in these radios, but they are not the same design as the older Ten-Tec radios, and so you don't need to rebuild them. The tuning is stiff, however, which does take some getting used to. Also the computer adjustments to help keep the signal from drifting means that very minor adjustments are almost impossible (because the computer interprets a very small adjustment as drift, and compensates back again).

They give the confidence of being rock-solid radios that can take abuse and won't ever die. If you can afford to try out a Scout, I'd recommend that you do, unless of course you are afraid of falling in love with its simplicity.

I agree with Kevin: I have had my prototype (beta test) Scout in my mobile for about 19 years now, and it still works very well. No drift, unless it's a winter day and the temp inside the van changes from zero to 115 F because of the heater blast. At those times I just flip the rig off and back on to reset the AFC lock. QRQ CW 99% of the time with no drift. I do open the rig and pull out and plug back in the Pic Microprocessor every few years to keep the contacts clean so it controls the freq properly. (mobile operation is not as clean as at home)

During beta testing I reported to Jack Burchfield that the receiver needed a 20 dB attenuator for noisy HF bands, since the RF gain runs full at all times. His reply was, "what do you want for $495?" (the original price) :-) (The production models never got the attenuator) High S meter readings of band noise will show up more often in the shack than mobile because of better antennas. (160 meters during a summer evening in the home shack will have the S-meter pinned continuously):-)

One last note: The Scout Noise Blanker is the best I have ever used. Better than any on previous and many later TT xcvrs.

Long live the Scout.

Perry   w8au



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>