TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] 60 Meters

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 60 Meters
From: Kevin Purcell <kevinpurcell@pobox.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Jul 2007 13:57:29 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Remember that 60m isn't a full privilege amateur band. Yet.

It's a domestic, secondary allocation shared with fixed/mobile service for evaluation purposes hence the "worse than secondary", "odd frequency notation", USB, channel assignments and ERP power restrictions.

But even given the restrictions N8S operated DX on channels and the result wasn't chaos. There are quite a few people "chasing" DX on 60m.

If one of the government radio administrations (Canada?) propose a amateur allocation at 60m at WRC 2009 we may see a full (300kHz, hopefully) all mode band.

The RSGB runs the UK 5MHz experiment was(is) run to evaluate the band in a more rigorous manner (i.e. you need a Notice of Variation on your license to operate there and to get that you have to propose the experiments that you intend to do). Interoperation with military cadets who also use the same channels is permitted too. They also permitted CW and other narrow modes like PSK 31 on the carrier frequency of each channel. This is an interesting form of reuse of space (there is that 200 or so chuck up from that carrier that the SSB sets can't hear) interleaving multiple modes. They also run a beacon network for propagation evaluation.

More details:

<http://www.rsgb-spectrumforum.org.uk/5mhz%20experiment.htm>
<http://g4irx.nowindows.net/fivemegs/comparison.php>

<http://60meters.info/websites.html>
<http://www.hflink.com/5mhz/>

<http://www.arrl.org/FandES/field/regulations/faq-60.html>

On Jul 3, 2007, at 3:17 AM, Bill Rowlett wrote:

I quess you said CB because you have never seen or used a Marine or
Commercial HF radio. Both use channels.

So, lets keep the snide remarks about CB where they belong.


KC4ATU



From: "philip c anderson" <flypca@hotmail.com>
Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 60 Meters
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 21:25:50 -0400

More CB influence, get used to it.


From: john.brewer@us.schneider-electric.com
Reply-To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] 60 Meters
Date: Mon, 2 Jul 2007 16:01:50 -0400

I will never get used to  the term "channels"  as applied to HF.....

sigh...

John k5mo

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_________________________________________________________________
http://im.live.com/messenger/im/home/?source=hmtextlinkjuly07

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_________________________________________________________________
http://imagine-windowslive.com/hotmail/?locale=en- us&ocid=TXT_TAGHM_migration_HM_mini_2G_0507

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

--
Kevin Purcell
kevinpurcell@pobox.com



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>