| To: | "tentec@contesting.com" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR |
| From: | Peter Bertini <radioconnection@gmail.com> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:49:03 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
*"I know that in the 1950's Collins did actually use a separate blanking detection receiver that ran on 9 mhz with its own antenna. I never used one but it must have been good."* The KWM-2 blanker ran on 40-MHz. There was probably too much interference in the HF region, and low VHF would give better results due to being able to respond to locally generated noise spikes. One thing I may have screwed up in my Omni VI is that there is either a SSB or CW roofing filter in line with the first filter. Pete _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR, Carl Moreschi |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] NB verses NR, Don Rasmussen via TenTec |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] NB verses NR, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |