As far as cw performance, the Flex 5000 has had transmit spur
problems, at least on 160M cw. It has been a heavily debated topic.
But I've definitely heard them myself. S9+ station 200 miles away had
S3 spur 2.4Khz below fundamental.
73, Barry N1EU
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Duane Calvin <ac5aa1@gmail.com> wrote:
> I would say the SSB performance is probably equivalent. My Orion I sounds
> great on both TX and RCVE.
>
> 73, Duane
>
> Duane Calvin, AC5AA
> Austin, Texas
> www.ac5aa.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Frank Kirschner
> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 3:31 PM
> To: N4PY2; Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Comparison of Ten Tec Orion II with Flex 500A
>
> That's probably enough to make the difference; I operate a lot of CW.
>
> If the SSB performance is much better with the Flex, that might move me back
> to undecided.
>
> Thanks for your response.
>
> Frank
> KF6E
>
> On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:02 PM, N4PY2 <n4py2@earthlink.net> wrote:
>
>> They are both great radios. The biggest difference is on CW. The Flex
>> radios have no CW QSK and the internal keyer in the Flex radios has
> latency
>> which makes using the internal keyer difficult.
>>
>> Carl Moreschi N4PY
>> 121 Little Bell Drive
>> Hays, NC 28635
>> www.n4py.com
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Frank Kirschner" <kirschne@erols.com>
>> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:50 PM
>> Subject: [TenTec] Comparison of Ten Tec Orion II with Flex 500A
>>
>>
>> > All,
>> >
>> > I realize that the two are very different realizations of transceivers,
>> > but
>> > from an operating standpoint, does anyone have any experience or
>> > observations? The cost is about the same for the two (or close enough
>> > that I'm considering them both). Which "works" better? Ability to hear
>> > signals, ability to transmit a signal that will be heard?
>> >
>> > I've read reviews of both, but without hands-on experience, there's no
>> way
>> > for me to compare, and I don't want to buy both.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > 73,
>> > Frank
>> > KF6E
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > TenTec mailing list
>> > TenTec@contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|