I don't know if this is true with WordStar 4.0 under the newer operating
systems, but I found that to avoid database corruption problems when running
dBase IV or Visual dBase 5.5/5.7 under XP and Vista, I used a small (20 GB
usually) separate hard drive formatted as a DOS 32 partition instead of an
NTFS partition.
And if someone needs a legacy PC with serial & parallel ports, contact me
off list. I have a few machines recently taken out of service, and two more
about to come out of service, that may fit the bill.
73, ron w3wn
May 19, 2009 04:44:45 PM, geraldj@storm.weather.net wrote:
On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 18:35 +0300, geoffrey mendelson wrote:
> One of the "features" of Vista was that it did not have hardware
> support for old devices and programing support for some of the older
> versions of Windows. It was designed with buying everything new. I've
> stuck with XP and still have my copies of WordStar 3.3 (PC DOS version
> of a CP/M program circa 1980) and WordPerfect 4.2 (circa 1986), both
> of which I use about once a year.
WS 4.0 works well in DOS, windoze, and OS/2. Later versions corrupt the
document files way too much, but in non document mode its great for
producing C source code. All my computer keyboards have CTRL just to the
left of A, customized for WS cursor motion. I use it daily for packet
radio and often for program source codes in OS/2.
I could link my windoze computers that aren't used often to this linux
computer for printer access, but I keep DOS for burning eproms and
running AutoCad 12 and its hard to do networks with DOS. I've not yet
tried to run AutoCad 12 with xdosemu. Maybe I should try that.
>
> Most new computers do not come with serial or parallel ports nor
> floppy drives. New radios will have to come with USB or Ethernet ports
> for computer control (doesn't the Omni 7 have an ethernet port?)
I suppose I'll only be using vintage computers as time passes. I can't
see using a 17 GHz CPU waiting for key strokes. The super fast CPU just
has to spend a greater fraction of its clock cycles in wait loops that
consume power just like adding and subtracting.
>
> Either that or the hot topic on 2m will be keeping old computers
> running.
There is some of that already. I'm talking about setting up a packet bbs
and since the software has been known to run on an 8088 at 4 MHz it
seems to be a waste to run a multiple GHz (and power hungry) super
Pentium or AMD doing such tasks. I would drop the clock speed on
whatever I use to reduce power consumption too for a computer that will
be running 24/7. I'm going to use a CF and adapter to the IDE connector
instead of a hard drive. That should save a few watts. I may do that to
my shack packet computer too.
>
> Geoff.
>
73, Jerry, K0CQ
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|