| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] IP3 vs. DR3 (IMD) confusion |
| From: | Chris Howard w0ep <w0ep@w0ep.us> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sun, 11 Sep 2016 13:18:22 -0500 |
| List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I seem to remember a series of letters or articles in QEX about the difficulties of characterizing SDR radios and how IP3 was no longer the thing. I'll see if I can find it. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] OT: IP3 and Receiver Performance, Jim Allen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] In Search of New Receiver Performance Paradigms - Re: IP3 vs. DR3 (IMD) confusion, Chris Howard w0ep |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] IP3 vs. DR3 (IMD) confusion, rick@dj0ip.de |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] In Search of New Receiver Performance Paradigms - Re: IP3 vs. DR3 (IMD) confusion, Chris Howard w0ep |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |