Like I mentioned in an earlier post, there are many variables in choosing a mic
to suit your needs. That is why I have about 2 dozen different microphones in
my recording studio. Some voices sound great on most any kind of setup,
others.....not so much.
Doug WD4LNW
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Apr 20, 2014 7:39 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
I use the 707 with the Omni VII and always get "great audio" reports.
Typical values:
SB TX BW 3000
X Roll Off 250
X EQ 0 dB
peech Processor 40%
IC GAIN 55% *
Value dependant on Hardware Mike gain.
3
ob, K4TAX
---- Original Message -----
rom: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
o: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
ent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 6:27 PM
ubject: Re: [TenTec] mike
hear my 707 on 1997 at 800 pm
-----Original Message-----
From: Rodney Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 5:33 PM To: Discussion of
Ten-Tec Equipment Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
708 has more lowin more bass
-----Original Message-----
From: Doug Reid
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2014 4:59 PM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
I agree with Bob's remarks. The two microphones use the same element, but
achieve different results.
Doug WD4LNW
-----Original Message-----
From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sun, Apr 20, 2014 4:45 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
The configuration and not the element, i.e., mounting, vents, back loading
nd such largely impact the response and more importantly the polar
esponse.
For that reason I prefer the 709 in place of the 708. One is
mnidirectional and one is unidirectional.
73
ob, K4TAX
---- Original Message -----
rom: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
o: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
ent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 8:17 PM
ubject: Re: [TenTec] mike
708 and 709 have the same element.
-----Original Message-----
From: K3GHH Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 9:14 PM To:
tentec@contesting.com Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
707 --> 709... I never see 708's mentioned, and that's what I have. What's
the list's view of that mike? I'm a CW guy. Hope this isn't too far from
the thread topic; Rodney's mention of these two skipping-over-708 mikes
provoked the question.
On 04/19/2014 08:15 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX wrote:
> Interesting approach. Thanks.
>
> 73
> Bob, K4TAX
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
> To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 6:55 PM
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>
>
>> Radio ORION11 I had tested my 709 and 707 with ham's that know me
>> and 6 ham's that don't know me did a ab test 709 was better every time
>> so I like the looks of the 707 so I traded the mike elements the 707 now
>> has the 709 and the 709 now has the 707 element.
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Bob McGraw - K4TAX
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 7:48 PM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] mike
>>
>> So what did you do? And what radio are you using?
>>
>> 73
>> Bob, K4TAX
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rodney" <w3krq@dejazzd.com>
>> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, April 19, 2014 5:50 PM
>> Subject: [TenTec] mike
>>
>>
>>> I made my 707 sound great.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
--
-- John K3GHH
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
______________________________________________
enTec mailing list
enTec@contesting.com
ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
______________________________________________
enTec mailing list
enTec@contesting.com
ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|