TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Earth those feeders

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Earth those feeders
From: Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:57:23 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
On 9/13/2011 8:39 AM, art davis wrote:
Does this mean that I am in violation of the NEC if I disconnect my coax and 
throw it out the window without grounding it?

No, but it makes you look stupid, because you are sticking a lightning attractor high up in the air, but failing to provide a discharge path for it. When you do that, lightning will build up a charge on that attractor, and find its own discharge path that may or may not be a path you would have chosen. Those who believe that simply disconnecting antennas is a good thing should read what W8JI, a retired broadcast engineer, has to say on the topic. Google to find his website, which I think is w8ji.com

How about ladder line where neither wire is a "ground"? . I don't see anywhere in the 
post where it is being recommended that the safety ground (green wire) be disconnected (the word 
"feeder" in the original post referring to antenna feeders, not power feeders). I gotta 
believe he means to disconnect/isolate the antenna feeds from the radio to break any ground loops 
that may exist by having both the chassis grounded and the coax grounded in different places.

The entire concept of a so called "ground loop" is fallacious. As a young engineer, I could never draw an electrical circuit that explained the idea, and as a mature engineer specializing in audio, EMC, and RFI, I now know that it is completely wrong-headed. The hum and buzz that occurs with many things interconnected using unbalanced wiring is caused by LEAKAGE CURRENTS from the AC power line. My tutorial on interfacing ham gear to computers discusses this in great detail.

http://audiosystemsgroup.com/HamInterfacing.pdf

Also, keep in mind that the NEC is written by the insurance companies.

No, it has NOTHING to do with insurance companies. You are confusing NEC with UL (Underwriters Laboratories), an independent testing laboratory that tests products of all sorts, primarily for fire safety and shock hazards. The UL Standards by which testing is done are established by consortiums from the industries for each product classification.

NEC is VERY different. It is a model Electrical Building Code jointly written and agreed upon by top engineers from many disciplines affected by the code. By itself, it has no force of law. But when it is adopted by local building departments that are part of local governments, it DOES carry the force of law. I know a few of the engineers who have contributed at one time or another. The NEC is revised every three years to address changes and additions needed to accommodate new equipment and technologies. The changes are always "nibbles around the edges," not major changes to how things are done.

About ten years ago, I was commissioned to write a tutorial on Power and Grounding for Audio and Video systems. It includes many references to NEC, and to other building codes around the world. It's on my website. http://audiosystemsgroup.com/publish.htm

73, Jim Brown K9YC


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>