| To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Rhombics |
| From: | Richards <jruing@ameritech.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 06 Dec 2010 01:05:28 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Gee, and I thought I mentioned signal-to-noise ... when I said :
> I guess it's just so quiet, signal-to-noise-wise
that it makes a good receiving antenna, but that
same inefficiency holds it back on transmitting
efficiency. > One of the happier paradoxes of life
Happy Days !
=================== James -K8JHR ========================
On 12/5/2010 7:31 PM, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP wrote:
I disagree. It depends on how on how you define "efficient". What matters is signal to noise difference. ========================================================== |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Rhombics, Richards |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] Speech to Text, John Chance-Read |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Rhombics, Rick - NJ0IP / DJ0IP |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Rhombics, John Graves |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |