| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux! |
| From: | Sinisa Hristov <shristov@ptt.yu> |
| Reply-to: | tentec@contesting.com |
| Date: | Sat, 15 Jan 2005 01:42:04 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Steve N4LQ wrote: > Yes you are correct. For noisy conditions you want a very fast decay Yes and no, depends on noise. For the "background" type of noise use hand time > 0 and slow decay. For strong impulse noise and strong atmospheric crashes using zero hang time and fast decay in order clips pulses. 73, Sinisa YT1NT, VE3EA _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [TenTec] Tricks for tuning weak signals? Omni6(opt3), tom stewart |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] yv5mbx - Orion operation issues, Javier Remoto |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux!, Bob Cunnings |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] N1eu Orion static Redux!, Steve N4LQ |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |