TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] RE: BPL

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] RE: BPL
From: Dan <n7nmd@arrl.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 16:38:28 -0700
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Have you tried to make a 9dBi gain beam for 160?

It's not fun.

:)

-Dan N7NMD

Don Rasmussen wrote:

Hi Guys,

Ever wonder why the lower limit for BPL was set
*above* the 160 meter band? They don't want to ruin
the AM broadcast band, my guess.


I already have a Phonex variation of BPL in my
neighborhood and it's not enjoyable, just tolerable at
the existing limit. And if they raise the radiation
limits, 160 meters is not a bad band, not bad at all.
I just don't know if there is room for all of us
there. Imagine - only one clean HF band.

de WB8YQJ/6

[TenTec] Fw: BPL
from [42hotrodz] [Permanent Link][Original]



__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search http://shopping.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec






_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>