TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] SWR is a DUMB Indicator of Antenna Performance

To: k9yc@arrl.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>, Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] SWR is a DUMB Indicator of Antenna Performance
From: Phil Sussman <psussman@pactor.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Sep 2014 11:23:29 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
"Bottom line -- SWR is DUMB, STUPID, and USELESS as a measure of antenna performance." --> TRUE


"I can LOAD a lightbulb, but it's a lousy antenna. --> NOT SO TRUE
I once used a 60w light bulb as a dummy load. But on 10m it worked JA 59. --> TRUE

73 de Phil - N8PS



Quoting Jim Brown <k9yc@audiosystemsgroup.com>:


My Ten-Tec 238 tune my 80 double ext.zepp on all bands 160-10 with a 4-1 balun 182 ft of 400 ladder line then the 4-1 with 20ft of coax.

No, it doesn't "tune" your 80 double ext.zepp, it creates a match between the transmitter and the FEEDLINE that allows the transmitter to dump power into the FEEDLINE. How much of that power gets to the antenna depends on the mismatch between the feedline and the antenna. It's pretty common to lose 10 dB between the transmitter and an "all band" dipole. 10 dB is 90% of the transmitter power.

I can make my 80M dipole look like 1:1 on 30M to my 200W amplifier, but mismatch loss is determined by the match between the ANTENNA and the FEEDLINE, and I would be burning 180 of those 200W in the feedline.

Bottom line -- SWR is DUMB, STUPID, and USELESS as a measure of antenna performance. I can LOAD a lightbulb, but it's a lousy antenna.

73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>