TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni C on 160

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>, Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni C on 160
From: Shawn Upton via TenTec <tentec@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Shawn Upton <kb1ckt@yahoo.com>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2017 21:35:16 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Ok, makes sense, less sensitivity needed, due to band noise.  Sounds like it's 
legit then.  Thanks.
shawn kb1ckt    On Saturday, November 25, 2017, 9:01:57 PM EST, Carl Moreschi 
<n4py3@earthlink.net> wrote:  
 
 When I had my Omni A years ago, 160 was always less sensitive than other 
bands.  I would say what you are hearing is normal.  160 has lots of 
band noise so being a little less sensitive on that band hurts nothing.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
58 Hogwood Rd
Louisburg, NC 27549
www.n4py.com

On 11/25/2017 6:56 PM, Shawn Upton via TenTec wrote:
> Finally added a 135' wire to my Hustler 6BTV so as to see if I could get onto 
> 160m.  Band seems more quiet than 80m--but that could be a number of factors, 
> I guess.  One thing I've noticed though is that the RX preselector (aka 
> resonate control) uses the same setting as it does on 80m.  Is this normal?
> I also noticed that I have to use "lots" of RF gain, more than on 80m--but 
> that could be antenna related--but I noticed one eham review that said the 
> Omni C had low sensitivity on 160m.  Is that normal?  I don't think I mind, 
> with my setup I don't need extra gain.
> shawn kb1ckt
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
  
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>