TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Raspy?

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Raspy?
From: n4lq@iglou.com (Steve Ellington)
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2002 17:54:47 -0500
It's the transmitted note, not the received and this was mentioned in the
QST review. I just had a QSO with one and it sounded like poor power supply
filtering but the owner described it as phase noise. He said it was great
for contesting!
Steve Ellington
N4LQ
----- Original Message -----
From: <duffyb01@fuse.net>
To: "Michael Todd" <hamike@earthlink.net>; <duffyb01@fuse.net>
Cc: <TenTec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 5:10 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Raspy?


> O.K., now I am confused.  Were you referring to the CW note on
transmission from the Jupiter or the CW note as received by the Jupiter?
>
>
> >
> > From: "Michael Todd" <hamike@earthlink.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Date: 2002/01/22 Tue PM 12:26:16 EST
> > To: <duffyb01@fuse.net>
> > CC: <TenTec@contesting.com>
> > Subject: [TenTec] Raspy?
> >
> >
> > > Never heard one report of a "raspy" sounding CW note.  Nothing but
good
> > reports have been received.  Anyone else experience this?
> >
> > I have just installed the Radio Shack #40-5024 speaker to see (hear) if
that
> > makes a difference.  Some signals have a more pronounced rasp than
others
> >
> > W9UQB/7    Mike
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>