TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3

To: <TenTec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3
From: "Mike Pagel" <k9uw@wi-net.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 11:51:42 -0500
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
My recollection is that the transition to surface mount components occurred
in later 6+'s and that the early units had more through the hole components.
Researching the issue brought up some helpful sites:

http://omni6.wikidot.com/6evol 

https://groups.io/g/TenTec/topic/27631497 

73,

Mike, K9UW
Amherst, WI

-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec On Behalf Of Paul Kraemer
Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2020 10:47 AM
To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3

Also the 564 VI+ is some surface mount construction and slightly different
font on front panel.

I have both and see no difference in performance.

Paul K0UYA

On 7/19/2020 5:59 AM, Greg Yates via TenTec wrote:
> Petr,
>
> I think the only difference is that the VI+ is directly from the factory
and the option 3 is one that was sent back to the factory for the upgrade.
>
> Greg
> WB2BIN
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec On Behalf Of Petr Ourednik
> Sent: Sunday, July 19, 2020 6:31 AM
> To: tentec@contesting.com
> Subject: [TenTec] Omni VI Plus or VI Opt. 3
>
> Hi folks,
>
> Sorry for bothering with that maybe stupid question...
>
> Can somebody explain me the differencies in between Omni VI Plus or VI
Opt. 3 please?
>
> As I have not that model in collection and never met it deeply just read
several articles and reviews ...I am newbie in that and want to know and
learn more about it.
>
> Many thanks,
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>