I haven't checked the frequency response of the AM on this release yet, but
I may do it over the weekend. Subjectively, it sounds good, and in the last
version, the TX response went from below 20 Hz out to about 4 kHz, although
it needed a bit of EQ to flatten the curve and boost articulation. It is
extremely clean sounding, and TX EQ now works. The AM RX improvement is
striking!
Ron Castro
Chief Technical Officer
Results Radio, LLC
N6IE
www.N6IE.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "Grant Youngman" <nq5t@tx.rr.com>
To: "'Ron Castro'" <ronc@sonic.net>; "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'"
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Updated Orion II "Wish List"
>I saw your comments on AM being "fixed". The really unfortunate part about
> this is that on the v1 Orion, AM just worked -- beautifully, with somewhat
> broader TX bandwidth, and the ability to reduce the bandwidth when
> conditions warranted. When I was on AM regularly with v1, the guys on the
> other end could not tell the diff between the Orion and my GK500. I guess
> I
> need to get the new release back on AM and see if that's again the case,
> although the limited TX bandwidth could be a giveaway.
>
> We all have a fovorite gripes :-)
>
> Grant/NQ5T
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com
>> [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Ron Castro
>> Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2007 1:31 PM
>> To: Ten Tec List
>> Subject: [TenTec] Updated Orion II "Wish List"
>>
>> I have updated my Orion II "Wish List" on my webpage at
>> www.N6IE.com. I invite everyone to take a look and let me
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|