YUKKKKKKKKKKKKKKKK
----- Original Message -----
From: RM
To: 'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'
Sent: Sunday, January 07, 2007 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A
Most of those folks certainly do produce a lot of 'growling' bassy
audio...... Great Audio???????????????????
Ron, NU1U
-----Original Message-----
From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
On Behalf Of Gary Hoffman
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 19:31
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Class A
Perhaps, perhaps....but how does this relate to Ten-Tec radio equipment ?
73 de Gary, AA2IZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "yahoo email" <barbiekenw@yahoo.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 06, 2007 12:36 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Class A
> I think the folks who engage in all the modified audio and broadcast
quality activity are folks who do not have a good healthy
> activity outlet -- like CW, or a test bench. Have you ever met someone
who was into ESSB etc who was a CW operator?
> With the new "no C W" extra class operators, there will likely be more of
this misguided activity.
> Ken K5WK
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|