Re: [TenTec] Re: FULL QSK? What it is

["Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>]

Al,

Would you do me a big favor and get off the '100 wpm' crap!! As far 
as I know, I am the only one who made that post. Ten Tec does not 
sell only to me. If you acutally have anything to add about QSK, how 
about talking about QSK in the normal speeds that 99% of ham 
operators use their rig. Full QSK at high speed CW is my problem to 
solve and so far you are not adding a thing worthwhile to the 
discussion of QSK.

Thank you.

Tom - W4BQF

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <al_lorona@agilent.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2004 6:18 PM
Subject: RE: [TenTec] Re: FULL QSK? What it is



> I always considered full-break-in (full qsk) to be where I can 
> hear
> between all sent characters, more to make sure no doubling with 
> the
> station is taking place than anything else, as this will cause 
> much
> confusion.
> Mike N9IVO

Hi, Mike,

Understand that confusion arises here because one must address the 
question, At what *speed* can you hear between the characters?, 
which you have not done. If I can hear between the characters at 40 
or 68 or 100 words per minute, that may satisfy me but may not be 
sufficient for someone who demands that ability at, say, 120 words 
per minute. At that point, the standing condition is called "Full 
QSK" by one person, and "No QSK" by another.

We've already had one claim that "True Full QSK" is the ability to 
hear between dits at infinite speed, and that any less, is, well, 
less than "Full QSK".

Regards,

Al W6LX



_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec