On Tue, Jun 27, 2000 at 07:34:49PM -0400, Michael L. Therrien, MD wrote:
>
> Being a die-hard TR user, I refused to work FD with my club in CT.
>
> Everybody else used CT 9.26 We wanted to merge my converted TR log into CT.
>
> Tried to convert my *.dat log to CT version 8 with logconv then convert to
> version 9 of CT using 8to9 but the 15 meter CW shows up as 40N and the 10
> meter CW shows up as 20 in the band field.
>
> Any thoughts?
Which part failed? Does the CT8 format log created by logconv look rational?
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kenneth E. Harker "Vox Clamantis in Deserto" kharker@cs.utexas.edu
University of Texas at Austin Amateur Radio Callsign: WM5R
Department of the Computer Sciences President, UT Amateur Radio Club
Taylor Hall TAY 2.124 Maintainer of Linux on Laptops
Austin, TX 78712-1188 USA http://www.cs.utexas.edu/users/kharker/
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/trlog
Submissions: trlog@contesting.com
Administrative requests: trlog-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-trlog@contesting.com
Feature Wishlist: http://web.jzap.com/n6tr/trwish.html
|