Hi Gary and SECC...I am in the same interest about skimmer...I am not going
to condem it yet...it needs to be used in a contest and actually see it's
uses...for my part as a M-M , it will maybe fill in some info that packet
might be missing...but as with packet it has to be used with a grain of
salt...it might miss-copy a call, and like packet all calls need to be
copied and verified!! I refuse to jump on the bandwagon of the petition
folks quite yet!! I am taking a wait and see attitude here....
de Rick NQ4I
On Mon, May 5, 2008 at 10:11 AM, K9AY <k9ay at k9ay.com> wrote:
> Skimmer is certainly a topic worthy of debate about it's place in the
> rules,
> but before I jump to a conclusion, I'd like to see real-world data on
> contesting with Skimmer -- maybe even try it myself.
>
> I recall similar debates about spotting nets/packet, computer logging,
> SO2R -- even 'hired gun' guest ops.
>
> 73, Gary
> K9AY
>
>
>
> > Please consider signing this petition if you are opposed to
> > Skimmer being allowed in the Single Opr category.
> >
> > The link is http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/skimmer
> >
> > If you sign it, please use your name followed by your callsign. When
> you
> > sign it, you do not need to go to the next step where they try to get
> you
> > to
> > make a donation.
> >
> >
> > Jeff KU8E
>
> _______________________________________________
> SECC mailing list
> SECC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/secc
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/secc/attachments/20080505/3ac24b6e/attachment.html
|