[SECC] GQP-2004

Subject:	[SECC] GQP-2004
From:	k4sb at earthlink.net (K4SB)
Date:	Mon Aug 11 23:07:56 2003

Tom Drake wrote:
> Maybe it's time for a re-vote
---------------------
This matter was voted on and passed by an overwhelming majority. I see
no reason to continually argue about this matter.

73
Ed

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[SECC] GQP-2004, Bill Coleman [SECC] GQP-2004, Tom Drake [SECC] GQP-2004, Jeff Clarke [SECC] GQP-2004, Jay Pryor [SECC] GQP-2004, John Laney [SECC] GQP-2004, Tom Drake [SECC] GQP-2004, K4SB <= [SECC] GQP-2004, Jeff Clarke [SECC] GQP-2004, Jeff [SECC] GQP-2004, Tom Drake [SECC] GQP-2004, Jeff Clarke [SECC] GQP-2004, SavageBR@aol.com [SECC] GQP-2004, SavageBR@aol.com [SECC] GQP-2004, K4SB [SECC] GQP-2004, Dan/W4NTI [SECC] GQP-2004, ku8e@bellsouth.net

Previous by Date:	[SECC] Lunch Saturday, Bill Coleman
Next by Date:	[SECC] GQP-2004, Jeff Clarke
Previous by Thread:	[SECC] GQP-2004, Tom Drake
Next by Thread:	[SECC] GQP-2004, Jeff Clarke
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]