| Subject: | [SECC] Tie-breaker | 
|---|---|
| From: | k4sb@mindspring.com (Ed) | 
| Date: | Wed, 06 Jun 2001 16:24:24 +0000 | 
| Jay Pryor wrote: > > The possibility exists that we could have a tie for one or more of the > spots for the SECC nomination for WRTC-2002. I see no reason why the "tie vote" could not be voted on by the membership at large. Simply establish a deadline for the original vote, a deadline for the "tiebreaker" and let it go. 73 Ed -- SECC on the Web: http://secc.contesting.com/ Submissions: secc@contesting.com Administrative requests: secc-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-secc@contesting.com | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | [SECC] Tie-breaker, n4uk@mindspring.com | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [SECC] IMPORTANT REMINDER, Jay Pryor | 
| Previous by Thread: | [SECC] Tie-breaker, John Laney | 
| Next by Thread: | [SECC] Tie-breaker, n4uk@mindspring.com | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |