To: | "sd-user@contesting.com" <sd-user@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM? |
From: | Paul O'Kane <pokane@ei5di.com> |
Date: | Mon, 21 Feb 2011 15:14:33 +0000 |
List-post: | <sd-user@contesting.com">mailto:sd-user@contesting.com> |
On 21/02/2011 12:19, Alex GM3ZBE wrote: > I seem to recollect that in previous versions when using ESM S+P I could > send my call a second time when the cusor was in the report field, > presumably because SD recognised that the report field was still blank. I've checked it here, and it seems to be working as expected (as described above). I've not changed any ESM code in a long time. Can anyone else comment? 73, Paul EI5DI _______________________________________________ SD-User mailing list SD-User@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sd-user |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM?, Alex GM3ZBE |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM?, Alex GM3ZBE |
Previous by Thread: | [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM?, Alex GM3ZBE |
Next by Thread: | Re: [SD-User] Changed behaviour in ESM?, Alex GM3ZBE |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |