RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] CQ-Contest SO2R
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:43:43 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:21:20 -0400, "Joe Subich, W4TV"
<w4tv@subich.com> wrote:

>other than you don't like SO2R and don't 
>want their kind in your neighborhood,

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Where did that come from? I have no quarrel with SO2R. I encourage
SO2R and I always have, I just want SO1R and SO2R to be separate
classes.

I nearly always operate HP. Does that mean I am "against" LP or QRP?
Of course not. It's only fair they should have their own classes. It's
the same with SO2R. In most contests HP has it's own class and so
should SO2R. I compete against other HP'ers because it is fair. SO2R
has a comparable advantage and should be classed the same way.

I am appealing to contest sponsors to make it so.

Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>