Re: [RTTY] FW: If you care about CW and RTTY - time is of the essence

[Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com>]

Matthew, try to stick to the subject. Stations operating under 97.221(c) 
regularly blast anything in their way
and if the P3 stations would stay where they belong it would help. No 
one said anything about current
stations running 6kHz wide modes.....where the hell did that come from??

Ron K0IDT


On 8/16/2016 5:49 AM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
> Ron,
>
> How often are hams in the RTTY/data segment interfered with by 6 kHz bandwidth 
> signals that originate from hams now? If the answer is they haven't been, you 
> have your answer about the question.
>
> Matthew Pitts
> N8OHU
>
> On August 14, 2016 3:59:23 PM EDT, Ron Kolarik <rkolarik@neb.rr.com> wrote:
> > Matthew, it's happening now with the 97.221(c) stations. What makes you
> >
> > think the wide band stuff
> > will behave any better? The big problem is no one, not the FCC or the
> > ARRL, is watching or responding
> > to complaints.
> >
> > Ron K0IDT
> >
> >
> > On 8/14/2016 9:34 AM, Matthew Pitts via RTTY wrote:
> > > Some major flaws that I see in his argument are:
> > >
> > > 4: As I said before, claims of a massive increase in the number of
> > automatic stations or wide bandwidth digital voice stations swamping
> > the RTTY/Data bands are nothing more than FUD.
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > RTTY mailing list
> > RTTY@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty