RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 160

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 160
From: "Robert Chudek - K0RC" <k0rc@pclink.com>
Reply-to: Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc@pclink.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:42:19 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
And the reason for 0 contacts on 160 by these stations is most likely based 
upon the rule that multipliers count only once, regardless of which band 
they are work on. In addition, in a contest you will have a higher rate on 
the other bands.

My opinion is the scoring method will self impose a limit to the RTTY 
activity on 160m that weekend.

73 de Bob - KØRC in MN


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Tippett" <btippett@alum.mit.edu>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2008 11:42 AM
Subject: [RTTY] 160


>
>
> W6WRT:
> >160 meters is never crowded, even during major contests.
>
> then,
> >I'll bet it is mostly empty outside the bottom 50 or so kHz.
>
>         Back-peddling alert!  :-) After K1MK's comment that
> 160 operation is nothing new in TARA since 2006, I looked
> up last year's top category scores claimed on 3830:
>
> W4ZE -  782 Qs total, 0 on 160 (MS-HP)
> K4GMH - 750 Qs total, 0 on 160 (SO-HP)
> VY2SS - 431 Qs total, 0 on 160 (SO-LP)
>
> To repeat K1MK's quote (from K5ZD about SS I recall):
>
> "If you're on 160, then you're losing the contest."  To do
> so during a major 160 contest is even more ludicrous.  I'll
> be anxiously awaiting some big 160 totals from W6WRT in TARA.
> ;-)
>
>                                         73,  Bill  W4ZV
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>