To: | RTTY Reflector <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint: RST and QSOs |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat@outlook.com> |
Date: | Thu, 1 Feb 2018 23:56:21 +0000 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
------------ ORIGINAL MESSAGE ------------(may be snipped) On Thu, 1 Feb 2018 15:21:23 -0500, AB1J wrote: >The FCC is not concerned with reception REPLY: Been a ham for 60 years, and as best I recall, it wasn't the FCC that required RST, but rather the ARRL. They required an "exchange of information" for a valid QSO. This was satisfied with an RST report. >From what I've heard, the ARRL at some point dropped even that requirement. FWIW 73, Bill W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint: RST and QSOs, Kermit (aka Ken) via RTTY |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [RTTY] CTY-2803 Country Files - 05 February 2018, Jim Reisert AD1C |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] BARTG Sprint: RST and QSOs, Kermit (aka Ken) via RTTY |
Next by Thread: | [RTTY] CTY-2803 Country Files - 05 February 2018, Jim Reisert AD1C |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |