RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure?

To: Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net>, RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Change in pileup procedure?
From: "Anthony (N2KI)" <n2ki.ham@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2014 19:53:54 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I agree.  It certainly is worth a try.  Anything is better than the mayhwm
that exists now.  I worked FT5ZM tonight for the first time on 20cw and 40
USB.  Need the RTTY contacts.


Regards,

Anthony (N2KI)






On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Bill Turner <dezrat1242@wildblue.net> wrote:

> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:          (may be snipped)
>
> On 2/3/2014 1:42 PM, Anthony (N2KI) wrote:
>
>> How do you prevent the "slim" from coming back to you on your frequency
>> as the DX station?  That will be the next problem.  Just a thought.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Anthony (N2KI)
>>
>
> REPLY:
>
> That problem already exists. I've heard the slim call on the DX frequency,
> pretending to be him. You usually can tell a difference in the signal,
> either strength and QSB, format of the reply, or on CW, speed. I'd have a
> macro that says QRT LID or words to that effect.
>
> Keep in mind the advantages:  No jammers on the DX frequency, no
> interference from guys who forget to go split  and no cops with their UP UP
> UP. Even if the slim is jamming someone, it's only ONE station instead of
> jamming the DX for everybody.
>
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>