To: | Peter Laws <plaws0@gmail.com>, RTTY <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum? |
From: | Bill Turner <dezrat1242@ispwest.com> |
Date: | Mon, 16 Jan 2006 14:22:16 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
ORIGINAL MESSAGE: At 12:04 PM 1/16/2006, Peter Laws wrote: >It says *nothing* about protecting CW ... I mean "reduc[ing] or >eliminat[ing] cross-mode QRM". Experimenting with narrower-shift >BAUDOT RTTY is **exactly** the type of thing that the ARRL proposal >says it wants to encourage. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ You're right. I was referring to my take on it. I have a lot of company, too. Bill, W6WRT _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [RTTY] Alaska, Inbody, Don |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth proposal (dup), psussman |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum?, Peter Laws |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] uh, what about spectrum?, Kok Chen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |