On Nov 27, 2014, at 9:46 AM, Dennis Egan wrote:
> I have been a convert to Pseudo FSK for over 2 years now, using the FSKit.
FSKit does not use pseudo-FSK (pseudo-FSK is pioneered by fldigi). FSKit
actually implements full AFSK demodulation between *two* tones from the
computer to threshold the FSK keying line.
Pseudo-FSK decodes a *single* on-off tone from the computer.
As such, the FSKit should produce a Mark bit duration that is very close to the
Space bit duration.
However, if you ensure that the single pseudo-FSK tone has plenty of amplitude
and the hardware detector is properly constructed (rise time == fall time, if
thresholding at half amplitude), it should be close enough to what the FSKit
does.
Simple pseudo-FSK circuits may or may not produce constant Mark and Space
periods -- in fact, I have seen circuits that will bias in one direction when
it receives two or more consecutive Marks (thus produce a kind of deterministic
jitter).
One advantage of the FSKit is that it works with any software modem that puts
out AFSK. To use pseudo-FSK, the software needs to (1) turn off one of the the
two AFSK tones, and (2) hits the audio output with a tone risetime that is as
short as possible.
For those with modems like the ST-8000 that can do Mark-only demodulation, the
analogy is the FSKit hardware module demodulates using Mark/Space, while
pseudo-FSK module demodulates using Mark-only.
Indeed, you can feed an SSB transmitter with the on-off keyed pseudo-FSK tone
and be able to decode using a Mark-only modem (or Space-only, depending on
polarity). But do that only onto a dummy load/directional coupler, since you
will be transmitting with keying sidebands that are as wide as non-phase
continuous FSK :-).
Gobble, gobble; remember that you are what you eat! (And I do have lots to be
thankful for.)
73
Chen, W7AY
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|