A good opinion to express to the various ARRL directors, officers, etc. They
do have a good
channel, and hopefully the motivation to educate us on our errors of fact, or
better yet
work to resolve the issues that many of us see so clearly.
Mark. N2QT
> On Jan 7, 2014, at 4:54 PM, Michael Haack <mikehaack@aol.com> wrote:
>
> Well, at this point maybe the thing to do is for the ARRL to withdraw
> RM-11708.
>
> Allowing the involved parties to resolve their “fundamental misunderstanding”
> of the real intentions of RM-11708.
> I'm sure we would all like to know what they are.
> And maybe by allowing input prior to, not after the fact, we can avoid such
> misunderstandings in the future.
>
>
>
> 73, Mike WB9B
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>> On 2014-01-07 3:13 PM, Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> I'm appalled that we are misguided fools.... we have mistaken benevolence
>> for threat........
>>
>> The Empire has issue the definitive rebuttal to all our foolishness:
>> http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-reply-comments-cite-fundamental-misunderstanding-of-symbol-rate-petition
>>
>> in :
>>
>> http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/comment/view?id=6017582527
>>
>> 73, HNY,
>>
>> Ben - WB2RHM
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|