To: | <ku8e@bellsouth.net>, <rtty@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM] |
From: | "J. Michael Furfari" <Furfari_JM@adelphia.net> |
Date: | Mon, 7 Feb 2005 21:13:26 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
seems like both RTTY and CW have EQUAL privileges to use this portion of the
band, probably splitting the band (7030-7040 for rtty and 7040 and above for
CW) would be a better solution than complete abstinence ??? I realize the Sprint requires people to jump frequency after completing a contact and not hold a frequency so the old listen before you leap might not work so well with this contest combination. just my 2 cents. 73 de Mike K3FH ----- Original Message ----- From: <ku8e@bellsouth.net> To: <rtty@contesting.com> Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 10:07 AM Subject: [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM]
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM], ku8e |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM], Don Hill AA5AU |
Previous by Thread: | [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM], ku8e |
Next by Thread: | RE: [RTTY] [Fwd: [SECC] CW Sprint vs RTTY Contest QRM], Don Hill AA5AU |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |