----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <k4ik@subich.com>
To: "'George Henry'" <ka3hsw@earthlink.net>
Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 2:10 PM
Subject: RE: [RTTY] ARRL Bandwidth Proposal - FCC Invites Comments
>
>> In reality, the only people who could legitimately claim to NEED
>> the decoding software would be a repeater operator whose machine
>> is being used to relay digital transmissions, and the FCC itself.
>
> Absolutely wrong ... the Amateur Service is self (or peer) policing.
> In order to maintain any semblance of self-policing, the decoding
> software is an absolute necessity for any amateur.
>
Still not buying it, Joe... all that is necessary is to record the
offending signal & send the recording
to the FCC. No need to decode it at all. That's still "self-policing" -
and it has worked just fine that way
for many years.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|