"If solar systems were included in the rules, there is always a risk
that they would be lumped in the same category."
How about focusing on rule(s) that:
1. Applies.
2. Matters.
3. Done correctly.
...rather than risk applying what already exists, because in the future,
something else may erroneously lumped into something currently
ineffective, without opposition, or, is focusing on an actual issue
before it becomes widespread, despite years of observation, with
multiple examples, too much to expect from the moment it was realized,
onward?
Seems the current way of handing things is along the lines of, 'We can't
regulate the tartness of pickles in the Antarctic tropic regions,
because then murder would be poorly regulated on a planet we haven't
imagined yet, so we're too scared to bother'
Kurt
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|