To: | rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto |
From: | Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com> |
Reply-to: | jim@audiosystemsgroup.com |
Date: | Mon, 6 Nov 2023 17:15:48 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
On 11/6/2023 5:33 AM, Hare, Ed, W1RFI via RFI wrote: The difference may be that phone service is vital to 99% of the population and most people use it personally daily. That doesn't help in my mountain community, where the "tin-hat brigade" and those with the money lobby, sue, and shout down any building permit for cell sites and even towers for other uses. Wide stretches of highways, local roads, and neighborhoods have no cell service from any vendor. 73, Jim K9YC _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Facility 406 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Facility 406 |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Facility 406 |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] FW: 65-foot cell tower in Chandler golf community can't be sto, Facility 406 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |