RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spe

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] More information regarding the FCC's TAC inquiry on the RF spectrum noise floor
From: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
Reply-to: dave@nk7z.net
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 13:17:00 -0700
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
On Wed, 2016-06-22 at 14:51 -0400, nm8rmedic wrote:
> Until evidence is presented otherwise, I don't think we can assume the
> ARRL is 'all over this' FCC RFI inquiry. 
> 
> I contacted the gentleman who was listed at the end of the document.
>  First, his ARRL email address did not work. After I dug around and
> found an IEEE address I was able to make contact.  But I didn't get
> much assistance in how to best address the FCC in this action. 
> 
> I requested other filing documents we could review so we didn't have
> to reinvent the wheel. The feds are pretty specific about format, so
> it would be a shame to have a well-conceived reply be rejected because
> it failed the formatting test. 
> 
> No help.
> 
> The army of volunteers the ARRL could bring to bear is left unfocused
> and unmanaged.  Each to his own. 
> 
> A very inefficient way to approach this battle.  
> 
> Yes, I've discussed this with ARRL leadership, all the way to the top
> of the ladder.
> 
> Scott

I will continue to assume the ARRL is actively involved.  I can't
imagine them missing this opportunity.
-- 

73's, and thanks,
Dave (NK7Z)
For software/hardware reviews see:
http://www.nk7z.net

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>