To: | ct-user@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead? |
From: | Nate Bargmann <n0nb@n0nb.us> |
Date: | Mon, 17 May 2010 17:58:21 -0500 |
List-post: | <ct-user@contesting.com">mailto:ct-user@contesting.com> |
Thanks for your time and information, Ken, and thanks for putting CT out there for us in the first place. It will be missed. 73, de Nate >> -- "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://n0nb.us/index.html _______________________________________________ CT-User mailing list CT-User@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/ct-user CT on the web: http://www.k1ea.com/ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead?, Ken Wolff |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead?, Ken Wolff |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead?, Ken Wolff |
Next by Thread: | Re: [ct-user] Is CT development dead?, Ken Wolff |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |