when i first switched from ct to tr i kinda thot the same until i began to
realize wat tree ( a world class contester) was trying to do in terms
improving operating efficiency etc........probably best if one had no
exposure to ct....it kinda spoils u in terms of ease of initial use.......
but, if u make the investment in time required to master tr you will (I believe)
be rewarded in the long term.......especially if u want to play with two
radio operations etc......
for the casual op ct wks but i grew very unhappy abt the support
level and lack of new features etc. with ct soooooo.... i took my bisiness
elsewhere!! also by using tr for general logging i keep my proficiency
up on all the features and setup options....then occasionally i xfer the
log.dat file to my master log (DX4WIN) for qsling and record keeping.....
73 w7gg
----------
> From: wheeler <wheelerm@actrix.gen.nz>
> To: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> Subject: [ct-user] CT <> TR <> others
To: <ct-user@contesting.com>
> Date: Wednesday, June 04, 1997 7:33 PM
>
> hi
>
> Bob w7gg, has some good / excellant points.
>
> True CT support is lacking and development seems to have stopped !
>
> Where TR and others fail is in the User Interface, maybe I find this due to
> being used to CT, but TR , etc. needs work in this area.
>
> 73 de Malcolm ZL2UDF
>
>
>
> --
> Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
> WWW: http://www.ve7tcp.ampr.org/Software/ct
> Questions: owner-ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
--
Submissions: ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@ve7tcp.ampr.org
WWW: http://www.ve7tcp.ampr.org/Software/ct
Questions: owner-ct-user@ve7tcp.ampr.org
|