To: | <ct-user@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [ct-user] VHF Contest Cabrillo Format |
From: | Philip Barber" <pfbarber@worldnet.att.net (Philip Barber) |
Date: | Mon, 18 Jun 2001 23:36:44 -0400 |
For ARRL VHF contest I noticed the CT (9.57 and 9.63) Cabrillo file does not follow strict format as obtained via ARRL link. For example: Sent grid starts in CT column 42 vs. spec column 49. Rcvd call starts in CT column 47 vs. spec column 56 Rcvd grid starts in CT column 58 vs. spec column 74 Unable to determine if this will cause any problems with ARRL scoring program. Does anyone know how rigid the scoring criteria is concerning format? Thanks, Phil WA2LXE -- WWW: http://www.k1ea.com/ Submissions: ct-user@contesting.com Administrative requests: ct-user-REQUEST@contesting.com Problems: owner-ct-user@contesting.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [ct-user] Re: K1EA's CT Contest Logging Software Digest V4 #98, <pfbarber@worldnet.att.net (Philip Barber) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [ct-user] VHF Contest Cabrillo Format, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C) |
Previous by Thread: | [ct-user] CT and Field Day?, Geovincent@aol.com |
Next by Thread: | [ct-user] VHF Contest Cabrillo Format, <jjreisert@alum.mit.edu (Jim Reisert AD1C) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |